HomeThe Admissibility of Computer Generated Evidence - Evans Ufeli Esq.

The Admissibility of Computer Generated Evidence – Evans Ufeli Esq.

Date:

It is an established fact that today’s world strives largely on the use of Computers or electronic devices for diverse business and social transactions. The use of computer devices has gained incredible milestone in virtually every areas of the human life such that it is difficult to engage the current societal normatives without a fair knowledge of the use of Computers.  It follows therefore that most of the transactions emanating from these electronic interfaces form large part of materials required as evidence in court. Before the Evidence Act 2011 computer generated evidence were not admissible in our court as a general rule. The 2011 amendment of the Evidence Act facilitated the admission of electronic evidence under our law. The said act also laid down processes under which the electronic generated evidence can be admitted as evidence.

In a court proceedings where a document produced by a computer is relevant to the fact in issue the document is admissible as primary evidence to the extent that the party seeking to tender the said evidence must first prove to the court by way of oral evidence of the statement contained therein and show to the court that the computer itself meet the following criteria as provided by sections 84, 85 and 86 of the Evidence Act 2011.

(i) That the document was produced by the computer during a period when the computer was used regularly to store and process information for the purpose of  any activity carried on over that period, whether corporate  or not, or by any individual;

(ii) that over that period;  information of the kind contained in the statement or of the kind from which the information so contained in the derive was regularly supply to the computer in the ordinary course of those activities;

(iii) that through out the material part of the period the computer was operating properly or, if not, that in any respect in which it was not operating properly  or was out of operation during that part of that period was not such as to affect the production of the document or the accuracy of its contents; and

(iv) that the information contained in the statement produces or is derived from information supplied to the computer in the ordinary course of those activities.

Now, to show the court  that the above conditions is in existence in favour of the document sought to be tendered the party seeking  to tender same is required to produce a certificate which will ;

(1) Identify the document containing the statement and describe the manner by which it was produced.

(2) Give such particulars of any device involved in the production of that document as may be appropriate for the purposes of showing that the document was produced by a computer, and;

(3) Deal with any of the matter to which the conditions stated earlier related.

Note that the certificate must be signed by a person occupying a responsible position in relation to the operation of the relevant device or the management of the relevant activities as the case may be and this includes the proprietor or proprietress of a business centre.

However were it is shown that the original document  is destroyed or lost and all reasonable effort have been made  to find it without success and the file in which it was stored in the computer has been deleted or the original documents is in the hand of the person against whom it is sought to be prove or in the hand of some person who is not reachable or who fail to produce the document after due notice a secondary evidence of a document produced by computer will be admissible.

In conclusion, even when this secondary evidence is admissible the conditions set out in Section 84 (2) of the Evidence Act must be satisfied and comply with to all intent and purposes.

Send your press release/articles to: info@dnlpartners.com ,Follow us on Twitter at @dnlpartners and Facebook at Facebook.com/Dnl-partners

 

 

 

 

© Copyright DNL Legal & Style 2017.

This piece may only be copied on the condition that DNL Legal & Style is duly acknowledged in this manner: “Source: DNL Legal & Style. View the original piece on: (insert Hyperlink)

Share on
PLACE YOUR ADVERT HERE

Related articles:

Senate: State Police Law Will Be Enacted Before Year-End as 24 States Approve Amendment

The Nigerian Senate has assured citizens that legislation to establish state police will be passed before the end of 2026, following the approval of the proposed constitutional amendment by the required number of state Houses of Assembly. The latest development came on Monday when the Ondo State House of Assembly approved the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (Sixth Alteration) Bill, 2026, which seeks to establish state police services across the country. Ondo’s approval followed similar decisions by 24 other state assemblies, including Osun, Adamawa, Delta, Edo, Kwara, Nasarawa, Ogun, Oyo, Plateau, Rivers, Taraba, Zamfara, Enugu, Anambra, Imo, Ekiti, Kebbi, Akwa Ibom, Bayelsa, Benue, Cross River, Abia, Yobe and Kaduna. With the required two-thirds of the state assemblies having approved the proposal, the constitutional amendment has reached the threshold needed for the next stage of the process. The Chairman of the Senate Committee on Media and Public Affairs, Yemi Adaramodu, said the National Assembly was committed to completing the process before lawmakers go on their Christmas break. Speaking in an interview with The PUNCH, Adaramodu described state police as a major priority in the ongoing constitutional review, adding that lawmakers intended to pass the legislation as soon as the necessary proposals arrived from the executive. He reaffirmed the Senate’s commitment to delivering a new policing framework before the end of the current 10th National Assembly, expressing confidence that the process would be completed before the end of the year. His statement comes as the Presidential Working Group on the National Policing Bill submitted the draft National Policing Bill, 2026, alongside 29 related amendment bills, to the Ministry of Justice for legislative drafting review and validation. The working group, chaired by the President’s Chief of Staff, Femi Gbajabiamila, expects the ministry to return the validated documents by October 30. The group will then review the drafts before presenting them to President Bola Tinubu for approval and subsequent transmission to the National Assembly. Gbajabiamila had earlier indicated that the proposed legislation was approximately 90 per cent complete and was expected to be sent to the National Assembly on October 29. However, Adaramodu declined to confirm the executive’s proposed timetable, explaining that the Senate would wait for the official submission before commenting on the next steps. He also dismissed concerns that delays in obtaining approval from state legislatures could affect the process. According to him, the 30 day deadline was intended for the state assemblies to submit their contributions, and the legislatures had been doing so. Adaramodu added that the National Assembly would review the submissions and convene a conference to address outstanding issues before concluding the process. He maintained that the proposed law would be prioritised because of the country’s continuing security challenges. He argued that establishing state police could improve the enforcement of existing laws and strengthen efforts to combat killings, kidnappings, banditry and terrorism. According to the Senate spokesman, Nigeria has enacted several laws intended to deter criminal activities, but effective enforcement remains a major challenge. He believes decentralising policing would bring security operations closer to communities and improve responses to local threats. Adaramodu also stressed that lawmakers intended to give relevant stakeholders opportunities to contribute to the proposed framework because the legislation would affect communities throughout the country. Meanwhile, Senator Victor Umeh, who represents Anambra Central, said the approval by 24 state assemblies meant the constitutional amendment had satisfied the required threshold. He explained that the documents would return to the National Assembly for verification. Umeh said lawmakers supported decentralised policing because of Nigeria’s large geographical size and the challenges of providing effective security through a single centralised police force. He argued that a state-based system could bring police commands closer to residents in different communities, making it easier to gather intelligence and respond promptly to criminal activities. According to the senator, officers familiar with their states’ languages, communities and local conditions could be better positioned to identify security threats and work with residents to address them. He also noted that criminals often operate within communities where local residents may have useful information about their activities. In his view, improved cooperation between police officers and residents could help security agencies respond more quickly to emerging threats. The proposed constitutional amendment seeks to modify Section 214 of the 1999 Constitution by replacing the existing Nigeria Police Force structure with a Federal Police Service and State Police Services. The Senate passed the Sixth Alteration Bill on June 24, 2026, and the House of Representatives subsequently approved it. The National Assembly transmitted the proposal to the 36 state Houses of Assembly on September 16 for consideration. Before the Ondo Assembly passed the bill, its Majority Leader, Olatunji Oshati, moved the motion for approval. The motion was seconded by Allen Oluwatoyin, who represents Ese Odo State Constituency. Oshati said lawmakers had carefully considered the implications of the proposed amendment and believed that state police could help address the security challenges facing the country. The Speaker of the Ondo State House of Assembly, Olamide Oladiji, also described the establishment of state police as a long-overdue reform. He said the proposed system could help security agencies respond more quickly to crimes and other security concerns through improved intelligence gathering and proactive policing. Following the approval, Oladiji directed the Clerk of the Assembly, Benjamin Jaiyeola, to forward the bill and the legislature’s observations to the National Assembly. Although the required number of state assemblies has approved the proposal, the legislation must still pass through the remaining constitutional and legislative stages before state police can be formally established.