The Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, Abdulrasheed Bawa, has accused lawyers of frustrating investigations by filing fundamental rights suits against the commission when their clients are served with invitation letters.
“As a lawyer, you cannot stop a law enforcement agency from carrying out its statutory duties,” he said.
Bawa spoke at the annual Alao Aka- Bashorun Memorial Lecture organised by Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Ikeja Branch held at the Bar Centre as part of the activities for the association’s Law Week 2021.
Bawa, who was represented by the Head of the Legal Department of the EFCC, Anselm Ozioko, also told lawyers to stop staking their Call to Bar certificate in a desperate bid to secure bail for their clients.
He stressed that it is not the responsibility of lawyers to bail suspects.
He said theirs was to recommend that someone is fit and proper to be a surety and not for them as lawyers to be playing a dual role of sureties.
Bawa, who was one of the panel members lined up for the event, spoke on the topic ‘Our Role in the Effective Implementation of Nigeria’s Anti-Corruption Law.’
The EFCC boss also asked members of the public to stop dragging the commission into failed business transactions.
He emphasised that the commission was not a debt recovery agency.
He noted that the public had a misconception that the commission was set up for debt recovery.
He said it is time the public should stop asking the anti-graft agency to recover debts.
“I want to state with all sense of responsibility that members of the public, including legal practitioners in the course of carrying out recovery for their clients, should stop urging us (the commission) to do so.
“I must also state that in the course of investigating a financial crime, it is possible that a sum of money transferred from the account of a nominal complainant, may be recovered as an exhibit.
“In certain circumstances, the exhibits may be released to the complainant or the said exhibit will be used for the prosecution of the suspect in court.
“At the end of a successful prosecution, the court may grant a Restitutive Order for the nominal complainant, in which the exhibit will be released to nominal complainant pursuant to the court Order,” he said.
He said that when the EFCC was approached by fraud victims, they typically expect the organisation to freeze bank accounts of suspects, make them forfeit their assets and release the assets to victims.
The chairman said when the EFCC followed due process and did not act in line with the expectations of the victims, they become disoriented.
Bawa said that despite best efforts of the EFCC, international online trading platforms like Paypal, have not restored Nigeria to its payment platform due to the nefarious activities of fraudsters.
On the roles of lawyers during interrogation, he said that they were to observe and not interfere with interrogations by the EFCC and that they were not to stand as sureties for suspects in EFCC custody.
“The EFCC has in some situations prosecuted lawyers who deposited their Call to Bar Certificates to stand sureties for suspects because their client jumped bail.
“In some cases, we reported such legal practitioners to the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee.
Also speaking at the forum, Layi Babatunde (SAN) queried why heads of government agencies should go to heads of courts to ensure that their matters are heard in a particular manner.
“Take for instance, the Assets Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON), they do this all of the time. Imagine how it will appear if bank debtors are to behave in like manner.
“This should not be taken lightly at all because no litigant has a right to go and discuss their case with the court, behind the other party’s back. That is corruption.
“The EFCC should look into it and we, as lawyers should not sit idle and allow it to happen. It is a form of intimidation.
“If we continue this way, foreign investors will not have faith in our judicial system,” Babatunde said.