Impeachment: Court to Hear Zamfara Deputy Governor’s Suit March 10

0

Justice Inyang Ekwo of the Abuja Division of the Federal High Court has adjourned till March 10, 2022, for definite hearing in a suit instituted by the Zamfara State Deputy Governor, Mahadi Gusau, seeking to stop the State House of Assembly from impeaching him on account of his refusal to decamp to the All Progressive Congresss (APC).

Justice Ekwo announced the adjournment yesterday, after ordering parties in the suit to file and exchange all their processes ahead of the date.

At yesterday’s proceedings, counsel to the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and Gusaau, Chief Emmanuel Ukala, appealed to the Judge, to make a definite pronouncement on maintaining the status quo.

In the alternative, the senior lawyer urged the Court to direct Chief Mike Ozekhome, counsel to Governor Mohammed Matawalle, the Chief Judge of Zamfara State and the Speaker of the Zamfara State House of Assembly, to give an undertaking for maintenance of status quo.

However, in his response, Ozekhome told the Court that Chief Ukala only served him the amended Originating Summons, the motion to revive the status quo, as well as a motion for interlocutory injunction last Friday.

He argued that by the Rules of Court, he was entitled to seven days each to respond to both motions and 30 days to respond to the amended Originating Summons.

He also argued that the status quo order granted in July 2021, had since expired after 14 days going by the Rules of the Federal High Court and that the said maintenance of status quo order was based on a mere letter of invitation sent to Gusaau to appear before the House to answer certain questions, and not an order against impeachment.

ALSO READ   Offa Robbery: Judge Faults Prosecutors For Delay In Trial

Ozekhome further argued that as a constitutional lawyer, he cannot give an undertaking which would have the effect of preventing the Zamfara State House of Assembly from carrying out its constitutional functions, including impeachment.

Ruling on the matter, Justice Ekwo held that the application for maintenance of status quo and the other processes were not ripe for hearing.

He advised both lawyers that whatever applications or grievances they might have should be taken to the next adjournment date.

He therefore granted Ozekhome seven days each to respond to the two motions and 21 days to respond to the Originating Summons.

He also granted Ukala time to file his responses.

Justice Ekwo subsequently adjourned the matter to March 10, 2022, for definite hearing of all pending applications.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here