HomeNewsIs “Call to Bar” Synonymous with Membership of a Bar Association?

Is “Call to Bar” Synonymous with Membership of a Bar Association?

Date:

By Prof Ernest Ojukwu, SAN (Teacher)


Generally, the answer is No.

A simpler way to frame the question is this: Does being called to the Bar automatically make one a member of a Bar Association? The answer depends on the jurisdiction. In Nigeria, however, the answer is Yes.

To understand why, it is important to distinguish between being called to the Bar and being a member of a Bar Association, let us look at the following:

Meaning of “the Bar”

The term “Bar” originally referred to the physical railing in old English courts that separated the public gallery from the area reserved for legal practitioners (barristers). Over time, “the Bar” came to signify the collective body of lawyers authorized to practice law in a given jurisdiction.

Being called to the Bar therefore refers to the personal milestone of becoming a qualified lawyer — one who has passed the required examinations, met character requirements, and been formally licensed to practice. By contrast, a Bar Association is the professional organization that represents lawyers, regulates their conduct, offers continuing education, and advocates for the profession.

In essence, being called to the Bar marks your entry into the legal profession and joining a Bar Association makes you part of the structured community of practicing lawyers.

In Nigeria, the authority to call a person to the Bar resides with the Body of Benchers.

Mandatory vs. Voluntary Bar Associations

Bar association membership can be mandatory (integrated/unified bar) or voluntary, depending on the jurisdiction.

England and Wales
In England, there is no “Bar Association” in the typical sense. A barrister becomes a member of the Bar upon being called to it. The Bar Council represents barristers, while the Bar Standards Board regulates them. In addition, there are traditional institutions such as the Inns of Court (Lincoln’s Inn, Inner Temple, etc.), as well as specialist and regional bar associations.

United States
In the U.S., “the Bar” also refers to the collective body of lawyers licensed to practice in a given jurisdiction (states). To practice law, a lawyer must be in good standing with the State Bar, which serves as the regulatory authority in most states. In integrated (or unified) bar states, all practicing lawyers are required by law to belong to the state bar. In other states, regulation is handled by a separate body, and membership in voluntary bar associations (such as the American Bar Association or New York State Bar Association) is optional.

Thus, while one must be admitted to the Bar to practice law, joining a voluntary bar association is not mandatory. For instance, in California, membership in the State Bar of California is compulsory for practice, but joining the California Lawyers Association is voluntary.

Canada
In Canada, legal regulation is handled by provincial and territorial law societies, membership in which is mandatory for practice. Meanwhile, bar associations (such as the Canadian Bar Association, CBA) serve advocacy and professional development functions and are voluntary. Each province or territory has its own CBA branch — for example: CBA–Alberta, CBA–British Columbia (CBA–BC), Ontario Bar Association (OBA), and others.

Regulatory control rests with law societies such as the Law Society of Ontario, Law Society of British Columbia, and Barreau du Québec- and membership is mandatory.

Nigeria
The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) is sui generis — unique in nature. Although registered as a voluntary association, it enjoys statutory recognition and performs regulatory functions under the Legal Practitioners Act (LPA) and the Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC). (Ojukwu, 2025)

Ordinarily, being called to the Nigerian Bar should not, in theory, require membership in the NBA. However, Nigerian courts have held — though arguably incorrectly — that being called to the Bar is synonymous with being a member of the NBA, but have correctly held that the NBA is a regulatory body for all lawyers, making membership effectively mandatory.

Judicial Authority
In Nigerian Bar Association v. Mr. Oluwole Kehinde (2017) LPELR–49798, the Court of Appeal held:
“The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) was established for the purpose of regulating the affairs and conduct of all legal practitioners in Nigeria and, upon being called to the Nigerian Bar, there is automatic membership to the NBA… Hence, as long as one has elected to join and remain within the noble profession, he is a member and ought to comply with the directives of the Association.” — Per Nimpar, JCA (pp. 25–27, paras. D–A)

The Court also recognized (correctly) that the NBA’s regulatory powers under the Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC) have the force of law.

Statutory Provisions under the Legal Practitioners Act (LPA)

The LPA formally integrates the NBA into the legal framework:
– Section 1(2) – 20 members of the NBA represent the Association at the Bar Council.
– Section 3(1) – The NBA President and 30 members sit on the Body of Benchers.
– Section 8(2) – The Attorney-General must consult the NBA before prescribing practicing fees.
– Section 8(3)(c) – 90% of the practicing fee is paid to the NBA.
– Sections 10(2), 10(3), and 23A – The Body of Benchers may exercise powers of management over the NBA.
– Section 11(2) – The NBA appoints four members to the Disciplinary Committee.
– Section 15(1) – The NBA President and three members must be on the Remuneration Committee.

Under the Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC), the NBA also handles:
– Lawyers’ stamp and seal issuance,
– Mandatory Continuing Legal Education (MCLE),
– Practice licence renewals,
– Anti–money laundering compliance, and
– Branch-level registration of new practitioners and law firms.

The proposed Legal Practitioners Bill 2025 further expands the NBA’s statutory and regulatory roles.

Conclusion

Given the NBA’s extensive statutory recognition, judicial endorsement, and regulatory authority, it would be purely academic to argue that membership in the Nigerian Bar Association remains voluntary. While “call to the Bar” and “Bar Association membership” are conceptually distinct, in Nigeria, the two have become functionally inseparable.

By Prof Ernest Ojukwu, SAN (Teacher)

Share on
PLACE YOUR ADVERT HERE

Related articles:

Senate: State Police Law Will Be Enacted Before Year-End as 24 States Approve Amendment

The Nigerian Senate has assured citizens that legislation to establish state police will be passed before the end of 2026, following the approval of the proposed constitutional amendment by the required number of state Houses of Assembly. The latest development came on Monday when the Ondo State House of Assembly approved the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (Sixth Alteration) Bill, 2026, which seeks to establish state police services across the country. Ondo’s approval followed similar decisions by 24 other state assemblies, including Osun, Adamawa, Delta, Edo, Kwara, Nasarawa, Ogun, Oyo, Plateau, Rivers, Taraba, Zamfara, Enugu, Anambra, Imo, Ekiti, Kebbi, Akwa Ibom, Bayelsa, Benue, Cross River, Abia, Yobe and Kaduna. With the required two-thirds of the state assemblies having approved the proposal, the constitutional amendment has reached the threshold needed for the next stage of the process. The Chairman of the Senate Committee on Media and Public Affairs, Yemi Adaramodu, said the National Assembly was committed to completing the process before lawmakers go on their Christmas break. Speaking in an interview with The PUNCH, Adaramodu described state police as a major priority in the ongoing constitutional review, adding that lawmakers intended to pass the legislation as soon as the necessary proposals arrived from the executive. He reaffirmed the Senate’s commitment to delivering a new policing framework before the end of the current 10th National Assembly, expressing confidence that the process would be completed before the end of the year. His statement comes as the Presidential Working Group on the National Policing Bill submitted the draft National Policing Bill, 2026, alongside 29 related amendment bills, to the Ministry of Justice for legislative drafting review and validation. The working group, chaired by the President’s Chief of Staff, Femi Gbajabiamila, expects the ministry to return the validated documents by October 30. The group will then review the drafts before presenting them to President Bola Tinubu for approval and subsequent transmission to the National Assembly. Gbajabiamila had earlier indicated that the proposed legislation was approximately 90 per cent complete and was expected to be sent to the National Assembly on October 29. However, Adaramodu declined to confirm the executive’s proposed timetable, explaining that the Senate would wait for the official submission before commenting on the next steps. He also dismissed concerns that delays in obtaining approval from state legislatures could affect the process. According to him, the 30 day deadline was intended for the state assemblies to submit their contributions, and the legislatures had been doing so. Adaramodu added that the National Assembly would review the submissions and convene a conference to address outstanding issues before concluding the process. He maintained that the proposed law would be prioritised because of the country’s continuing security challenges. He argued that establishing state police could improve the enforcement of existing laws and strengthen efforts to combat killings, kidnappings, banditry and terrorism. According to the Senate spokesman, Nigeria has enacted several laws intended to deter criminal activities, but effective enforcement remains a major challenge. He believes decentralising policing would bring security operations closer to communities and improve responses to local threats. Adaramodu also stressed that lawmakers intended to give relevant stakeholders opportunities to contribute to the proposed framework because the legislation would affect communities throughout the country. Meanwhile, Senator Victor Umeh, who represents Anambra Central, said the approval by 24 state assemblies meant the constitutional amendment had satisfied the required threshold. He explained that the documents would return to the National Assembly for verification. Umeh said lawmakers supported decentralised policing because of Nigeria’s large geographical size and the challenges of providing effective security through a single centralised police force. He argued that a state-based system could bring police commands closer to residents in different communities, making it easier to gather intelligence and respond promptly to criminal activities. According to the senator, officers familiar with their states’ languages, communities and local conditions could be better positioned to identify security threats and work with residents to address them. He also noted that criminals often operate within communities where local residents may have useful information about their activities. In his view, improved cooperation between police officers and residents could help security agencies respond more quickly to emerging threats. The proposed constitutional amendment seeks to modify Section 214 of the 1999 Constitution by replacing the existing Nigeria Police Force structure with a Federal Police Service and State Police Services. The Senate passed the Sixth Alteration Bill on June 24, 2026, and the House of Representatives subsequently approved it. The National Assembly transmitted the proposal to the 36 state Houses of Assembly on September 16 for consideration. Before the Ondo Assembly passed the bill, its Majority Leader, Olatunji Oshati, moved the motion for approval. The motion was seconded by Allen Oluwatoyin, who represents Ese Odo State Constituency. Oshati said lawmakers had carefully considered the implications of the proposed amendment and believed that state police could help address the security challenges facing the country. The Speaker of the Ondo State House of Assembly, Olamide Oladiji, also described the establishment of state police as a long-overdue reform. He said the proposed system could help security agencies respond more quickly to crimes and other security concerns through improved intelligence gathering and proactive policing. Following the approval, Oladiji directed the Clerk of the Assembly, Benjamin Jaiyeola, to forward the bill and the legislature’s observations to the National Assembly. Although the required number of state assemblies has approved the proposal, the legislation must still pass through the remaining constitutional and legislative stages before state police can be formally established.