The Federal High Court sitting in Lagos has restrained the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA) from enforcing its directive suspending the loading and truck-out of petroleum products from the Dangote Petroleum Refinery.
Justice Akintayo Aluko granted the interim injunction on Monday in an ex parte application marked FHC/L/CS/1174/2026, filed by Dangote Petroleum Refinery Nigeria Limited through its counsel, Olawale Akoni, SAN, and Abimbola Akeredolu, SAN.
The dispute followed a letter dated August 24, 2026, in which NMDPRA directed the suspension of loading and truck-out activities at the refinery.
Dangote subsequently approached the court seeking urgent protection against the enforcement of the directive while challenging NMDPRA’s authority to regulate operations within the Lekki Free Zone.
The refinery asked the court to restrain NMDPRA, its officers, agents, representatives and anyone acting under its authority from enforcing or giving effect to the August 24 directive pending the hearing and final determination of its motion on notice.
Dangote also sought an order preventing the regulator from entering, sealing, shutting down, restricting access to, obstructing, suspending, disrupting, inspecting, supervising, sanctioning or otherwise interfering with its refinery, petrochemical, terminal, storage, blending, loading, truck-out and related facilities located within the Lekki Free Zone.
Presenting the application, Akeredolu told the court that it was supported by a 42-paragraph affidavit deposed to by Wale Aroge, a written address and documentary exhibits marked A1 to A6.
She argued that the circumstances surrounding the dispute required urgent judicial intervention to preserve the subject matter of the litigation until the substantive issues raised by the refinery could be determined.
In his ruling, Justice Aluko held that the materials placed before the court disclosed serious questions requiring judicial determination, particularly regarding the scope of NMDPRA’s regulatory and oversight powers over activities carried out within free zones.
The judge noted that Dangote’s central argument was that NMDPRA lacked regulatory or oversight authority capable of affecting its operations within the Dangote Industrial Free Zone.
Justice Aluko also referred to a March 2, 2026, letter issued by the Attorney-General of the Federation which, according to the materials before the court, stated that NMDPRA was not authorised to exercise regulatory powers or oversight functions over operations within free zones.
The court observed that despite the position contained in the Attorney-General’s letter, NMDPRA subsequently issued the August 24 directive asserting regulatory authority over the refinery’s operations.
Justice Aluko said the immediate issue before the court was whether NMDPRA should be allowed to exercise the disputed powers while the substantive legal questions surrounding the extent of its jurisdiction remained unresolved.
He held that the depositions contained in paragraphs 17 to 32 of Dangote’s affidavit disclosed serious questions requiring examination by the court.
On the issue of urgency, the judge found that paragraphs 33 to 39 of the affidavit demonstrated circumstances warranting immediate judicial intervention.
Justice Aluko further held that the purpose of the interim relief sought by Dangote was to preserve the subject matter of the litigation pending the hearing of the motion on notice.
The court stressed that it possesses inherent powers and a duty to prevent the subject matter of litigation from being destroyed, altered or rendered ineffective before the substantive dispute is determined.
After considering the materials before it, Justice Aluko concluded that Dangote had satisfied the legal requirements for the grant of an interim injunction.
The judge also noted that the refinery had undertaken to compensate NMDPRA for any damages that might arise if it was ultimately established that the interim order ought not to have been granted.
“Accordingly, I find merit in the application, and the same is hereby granted in terms of the reliefs sought,” Justice Aluko ruled.
The court consequently restrained NMDPRA and anyone acting on its behalf from enforcing the August 24 directive or sealing, shutting down, restricting access to, suspending or otherwise disrupting operations at the Dangote refinery pending the hearing of the motion on notice.
Justice Aluko directed Dangote to file a formal undertaking as to damages and ordered that the interim order and accompanying court processes be served on NMDPRA.
The matter was subsequently adjourned to September 9, 2026, for hearing of the motion on notice.