HomeNews“I am Unapproachable”- Judge Warns Counsel in Malami Trial

“I am Unapproachable”- Judge Warns Counsel in Malami Trial

Date:

Justice Emeka Nwite of the Federal High Court, Maitama, Abuja, on Wednesday, January 7, 2026, warned counsel in the trial of former Attorney General and Minister o of Justice, Abubakar Malami, SAN and two others to desist from approaching him for any favour, cautioning that his leniency should not be taken for granted.

“I want to admonish and warn counsels and litigants that they should know the type of court they are appearing before. All judges are not the same. Irrespective of my familiarity with you, when I am dealing with any case, do not approach me. The best you can do for your clients is to get the best lawyers in this country. The law cannot be bent as far as this court is concerned. So, I want to warn each and every litigant and lawyer appearing before this court that they should understand the way this court works. Please, to be forewarned is to be forearmed. Any attempt to tarnish my name will be resisted and dealt with. I warned, I warned, and I warned!”, he said

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, is prosecuting Malami alongside his wife, Hajia Bashir Asabe, and son, Abubakar Abdulaziz Malami, over alleged money laundering offences to the tune of ₦8,713,923,759.49 (Eight Billion, Seven Hundred and Thirteen Million, Nine Hundred and Twenty-Three Thousand, Seven Hundred and Fifty-Nine Naira, Forty-Nine Kobo).

The defendants were docked on a 16-count charge bordering on conspiracy, procuring, disguising, concealing, and laundering proceeds of unlawful activities, contrary to the provisions of the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.

Count one of the charge reads: “That you, Abubakar Malami, SAN, and Abubakar Abdulaziz Malami, between July 2022 and June 2025, in Abuja, procured Metropolitan Auto Tech Limited to conceal the unlawful origin of the sum of ₦1,014,848,500.00 (One Billion, Fourteen Million, Eight Hundred and Forty-Eight Thousand, Five Hundred Naira) in a Sterling Bank Plc account, when you reasonably ought to have known that the sum constituted proceeds of unlawful activities, thereby committing an offence contrary to Section 21(c) of the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022, and punishable under Section 18(3) of the same Act.”

Count five reads: “That you, Abubakar Malami, SAN, Abubakar Abdulaziz Malami, and Hajia Bashir Asabe, an employee of Rahamaniyya Properties Limited, sometime in September 2024, in Abuja, conspired to disguise the unlawful origin of the aggregate sum of ₦1,049,173,926.13 (One Billion, Forty-Nine Million, One Hundred and Seventy-Three Thousand, Nine Hundred and Twenty-Six Naira, Thirteen Kobo) paid through the Union Bank Plc account of Meethaq Hotels Limited, Jabi, between November 2022 and September 2024, contrary to Section 21 of the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022, and punishable under Sections 18(2)(a) and 18(3) of the same Act.”

Count six reads: “That you, Abubakar Malami, SAN, and Abubakar Abdulaziz Malami, between November 2022 and October 2025, indirectly took control of the aggregate sum of ₦1,362,887,872.96 (One Billion, Three Hundred and Sixty-Two Million, Eight Hundred and Eighty-Seven Thousand, Eight Hundred and Seventy-Two Naira, Ninety-Six Kobo) paid through the Union Bank Plc savings account of Meethaq Hotels Limited, when you reasonably ought to have known that the funds constituted proceeds of unlawful activities, contrary to Section 18(2)(d) and punishable under Section 18(3) of the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.”

Earlier, the judge granted Malami, his wife, and son bail in the sum of ₦500,000,000 (Five Hundred Million Naira) each, with two sureties in like sum, who shall depose to an affidavit of means.

He held that the sureties must be landed property owners in either Asokoro, Maitama, or Gwarimpa, and that the documents must be verified by the Deputy Chief Registrar (Litigation) of the court and also deposited with the Deputy Chief Registrar of the court.

“Bail is granted to each of the defendants/applicants in the sum of ₦500,000,000 (Five Hundred Million Naira) each, with two sureties in like sum, who shall depose to an affidavit of means.

“The two sureties must be landed property owners in either Asokoro, Maitama, or Gwarimpa within the jurisdiction of the court, and the documents must be verified by the Deputy Chief Registrar (Litigation) of this Honourable Court and also deposited with the Deputy Chief Registrar of this Honourable Court.

“The defendants/applicants shall deposit their international passports with the Deputy Chief Registrar (Litigation) of this Honourable court and shall not travel outside the country without the permission of the court.

“The defendants/applicants, together with the sureties, shall each deposit two copies of their recent passport photographs with the Deputy Chief Registrar (Litigation) of this Honourable court.

“The residences of the sureties shall be verified or confirmed by the registrar of the court.

“The defendants/applicants shall continue to remain in Kuje Correctional Centre until the perfection of their bail conditions,” he ruled.

Justice Nwite thereafter adjourned the matter till February 17, 2026, for continuation of trial.

Share on
PLACE YOUR ADVERT HERE

Related articles:

Senate: State Police Law Will Be Enacted Before Year-End as 24 States Approve Amendment

The Nigerian Senate has assured citizens that legislation to establish state police will be passed before the end of 2026, following the approval of the proposed constitutional amendment by the required number of state Houses of Assembly. The latest development came on Monday when the Ondo State House of Assembly approved the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (Sixth Alteration) Bill, 2026, which seeks to establish state police services across the country. Ondo’s approval followed similar decisions by 24 other state assemblies, including Osun, Adamawa, Delta, Edo, Kwara, Nasarawa, Ogun, Oyo, Plateau, Rivers, Taraba, Zamfara, Enugu, Anambra, Imo, Ekiti, Kebbi, Akwa Ibom, Bayelsa, Benue, Cross River, Abia, Yobe and Kaduna. With the required two-thirds of the state assemblies having approved the proposal, the constitutional amendment has reached the threshold needed for the next stage of the process. The Chairman of the Senate Committee on Media and Public Affairs, Yemi Adaramodu, said the National Assembly was committed to completing the process before lawmakers go on their Christmas break. Speaking in an interview with The PUNCH, Adaramodu described state police as a major priority in the ongoing constitutional review, adding that lawmakers intended to pass the legislation as soon as the necessary proposals arrived from the executive. He reaffirmed the Senate’s commitment to delivering a new policing framework before the end of the current 10th National Assembly, expressing confidence that the process would be completed before the end of the year. His statement comes as the Presidential Working Group on the National Policing Bill submitted the draft National Policing Bill, 2026, alongside 29 related amendment bills, to the Ministry of Justice for legislative drafting review and validation. The working group, chaired by the President’s Chief of Staff, Femi Gbajabiamila, expects the ministry to return the validated documents by October 30. The group will then review the drafts before presenting them to President Bola Tinubu for approval and subsequent transmission to the National Assembly. Gbajabiamila had earlier indicated that the proposed legislation was approximately 90 per cent complete and was expected to be sent to the National Assembly on October 29. However, Adaramodu declined to confirm the executive’s proposed timetable, explaining that the Senate would wait for the official submission before commenting on the next steps. He also dismissed concerns that delays in obtaining approval from state legislatures could affect the process. According to him, the 30 day deadline was intended for the state assemblies to submit their contributions, and the legislatures had been doing so. Adaramodu added that the National Assembly would review the submissions and convene a conference to address outstanding issues before concluding the process. He maintained that the proposed law would be prioritised because of the country’s continuing security challenges. He argued that establishing state police could improve the enforcement of existing laws and strengthen efforts to combat killings, kidnappings, banditry and terrorism. According to the Senate spokesman, Nigeria has enacted several laws intended to deter criminal activities, but effective enforcement remains a major challenge. He believes decentralising policing would bring security operations closer to communities and improve responses to local threats. Adaramodu also stressed that lawmakers intended to give relevant stakeholders opportunities to contribute to the proposed framework because the legislation would affect communities throughout the country. Meanwhile, Senator Victor Umeh, who represents Anambra Central, said the approval by 24 state assemblies meant the constitutional amendment had satisfied the required threshold. He explained that the documents would return to the National Assembly for verification. Umeh said lawmakers supported decentralised policing because of Nigeria’s large geographical size and the challenges of providing effective security through a single centralised police force. He argued that a state-based system could bring police commands closer to residents in different communities, making it easier to gather intelligence and respond promptly to criminal activities. According to the senator, officers familiar with their states’ languages, communities and local conditions could be better positioned to identify security threats and work with residents to address them. He also noted that criminals often operate within communities where local residents may have useful information about their activities. In his view, improved cooperation between police officers and residents could help security agencies respond more quickly to emerging threats. The proposed constitutional amendment seeks to modify Section 214 of the 1999 Constitution by replacing the existing Nigeria Police Force structure with a Federal Police Service and State Police Services. The Senate passed the Sixth Alteration Bill on June 24, 2026, and the House of Representatives subsequently approved it. The National Assembly transmitted the proposal to the 36 state Houses of Assembly on September 16 for consideration. Before the Ondo Assembly passed the bill, its Majority Leader, Olatunji Oshati, moved the motion for approval. The motion was seconded by Allen Oluwatoyin, who represents Ese Odo State Constituency. Oshati said lawmakers had carefully considered the implications of the proposed amendment and believed that state police could help address the security challenges facing the country. The Speaker of the Ondo State House of Assembly, Olamide Oladiji, also described the establishment of state police as a long-overdue reform. He said the proposed system could help security agencies respond more quickly to crimes and other security concerns through improved intelligence gathering and proactive policing. Following the approval, Oladiji directed the Clerk of the Assembly, Benjamin Jaiyeola, to forward the bill and the legislature’s observations to the National Assembly. Although the required number of state assemblies has approved the proposal, the legislation must still pass through the remaining constitutional and legislative stages before state police can be formally established.